• 公告ID (KylinSec-SA-2024-2115)

摘要:

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

interconnect: Don't access req_list while it's being manipulated

The icc_lock mutex was split into separate icc_lock and icc_bw_lock
mutexes in [1] to avoid lockdep splats. However, this didn't adequately
protect access to icc_node::req_list.

The icc_set_bw() function will eventually iterate over req_list while
only holding icc_bw_lock, but req_list can be modified while only
holding icc_lock. This causes races between icc_set_bw(), of_icc_get(),
and icc_put().

Example A:

CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
icc_set_bw(path_a)
mutex_lock(&icc_bw_lock);
icc_put(path_b)
mutex_lock(&icc_lock);
aggregate_requests()
hlist_for_each_entry(r, ...
hlist_del(...
<r = invalid pointer&gt;

Example B:

CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
icc_set_bw(path_a)
mutex_lock(&amp;icc_bw_lock);
path_b = of_icc_get()
of_icc_get_by_index()
mutex_lock(&amp;icc_lock);
path_find()
path_init()
aggregate_requests()
hlist_for_each_entry(r, ...
hlist_add_head(...
<r = invalid pointer&gt;

Fix this by ensuring icc_bw_lock is always held before manipulating
icc_node::req_list. The additional places icc_bw_lock is held don't
perform any memory allocations, so we should still be safe from the
original lockdep splats that motivated the separate locks.

[1] commit af42269c3523 ("interconnect: Fix locking for runpm vs reclaim")

安全等级: Low

公告ID: KylinSec-SA-2024-2115

发布日期: 2024年5月28日

关联CVE: CVE-2024-27005  

  • 详细介绍

1. 漏洞描述

   

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

interconnect: Don't access req_list while it's being manipulated

The icc_lock mutex was split into separate icc_lock and icc_bw_lock
mutexes in [1] to avoid lockdep splats. However, this didn't adequately
protect access to icc_node::req_list.

The icc_set_bw() function will eventually iterate over req_list while
only holding icc_bw_lock, but req_list can be modified while only
holding icc_lock. This causes races between icc_set_bw(), of_icc_get(),
and icc_put().

Example A:

CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
icc_set_bw(path_a)
mutex_lock(&amp;icc_bw_lock);
icc_put(path_b)
mutex_lock(&amp;icc_lock);
aggregate_requests()
hlist_for_each_entry(r, ...
hlist_del(...
<r = invalid pointer&gt;

Example B:

CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
icc_set_bw(path_a)
mutex_lock(&amp;icc_bw_lock);
path_b = of_icc_get()
of_icc_get_by_index()
mutex_lock(&amp;icc_lock);
path_find()
path_init()
aggregate_requests()
hlist_for_each_entry(r, ...
hlist_add_head(...
<r = invalid pointer&gt;

Fix this by ensuring icc_bw_lock is always held before manipulating
icc_node::req_list. The additional places icc_bw_lock is held don't
perform any memory allocations, so we should still be safe from the
original lockdep splats that motivated the separate locks.

[1] commit af42269c3523 ("interconnect: Fix locking for runpm vs reclaim")

2. 影响范围

cve名称 产品 组件 是否受影响
CVE-2024-27005 KY3.4-4A kernel Unaffected
CVE-2024-27005 KY3.4-5 kernel Unaffected
CVE-2024-27005 KY3.5.1 kernel Unaffected
CVE-2024-27005 KY3.5.3 kernel Unaffected
CVE-2024-27005 V6 kernel Unaffected

3. 影响组件

    无

4. 修复版本

    无

5. 修复方法

   无

6. 下载链接

    无
上一篇:KylinSec-SA-2024-2114 下一篇:KylinSec-SA-2024-2116