• CVE-2024-27005

发布时间: 2024年5月28日

修改时间: 2025年4月13日

概要

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: interconnect: Don't access req_list while it's being manipulated The icc_lock mutex was split into separate icc_lock and icc_bw_lock mutexes in [1] to avoid lockdep splats. However, this didn't adequately protect access to icc_node::req_list. The icc_set_bw() function will eventually iterate over req_list while only holding icc_bw_lock, but req_list can be modified while only holding icc_lock. This causes races between icc_set_bw(), of_icc_get(), and icc_put(). Example A: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- icc_set_bw(path_a) mutex_lock(&amp;icc_bw_lock); icc_put(path_b) mutex_lock(&amp;icc_lock); aggregate_requests() hlist_for_each_entry(r, ... hlist_del(... <r = invalid pointer&gt; Example B: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- icc_set_bw(path_a) mutex_lock(&amp;icc_bw_lock); path_b = of_icc_get() of_icc_get_by_index() mutex_lock(&amp;icc_lock); path_find() path_init() aggregate_requests() hlist_for_each_entry(r, ... hlist_add_head(... <r = invalid pointer&gt; Fix this by ensuring icc_bw_lock is always held before manipulating icc_node::req_list. The additional places icc_bw_lock is held don't perform any memory allocations, so we should still be safe from the original lockdep splats that motivated the separate locks. [1] commit af42269c3523 ("interconnect: Fix locking for runpm vs reclaim")

CVSS v3 指标

NVD openEuler
Confidentiality None
Attack Vector Local
CVSS评分 N/A 4.0
Attack Complexity High
Privileges Required High
Scope Unchanged
Integrity None
User Interaction None
Availability None

安全公告

公告名 概要 发布时间
KylinSec-SA-2024-2115 In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: interconnect: Don't access req_list while it's being manipulated The icc_lock mutex was split into separate icc_lock and icc_bw_lock mutexes in [1] to avoid lockdep splats. However, this didn't adequately protect access to icc_node::req_list. The icc_set_bw() function will eventually iterate over req_list while only holding icc_bw_lock, but req_list can be modified while only holding icc_lock. This causes races between icc_set_bw(), of_icc_get(), and icc_put(). Example A: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- icc_set_bw(path_a) mutex_lock(&amp;icc_bw_lock); icc_put(path_b) mutex_lock(&amp;icc_lock); aggregate_requests() hlist_for_each_entry(r, ... hlist_del(... <r = invalid pointer&gt; Example B: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- icc_set_bw(path_a) mutex_lock(&amp;icc_bw_lock); path_b = of_icc_get() of_icc_get_by_index() mutex_lock(&amp;icc_lock); path_find() path_init() aggregate_requests() hlist_for_each_entry(r, ... hlist_add_head(... <r = invalid pointer&gt; Fix this by ensuring icc_bw_lock is always held before manipulating icc_node::req_list. The additional places icc_bw_lock is held don't perform any memory allocations, so we should still be safe from the original lockdep splats that motivated the separate locks. [1] commit af42269c3523 ("interconnect: Fix locking for runpm vs reclaim") 2024年5月28日

影响产品

产品 状态
KY3.4-4A kernel Unaffected
KY3.4-5 kernel Unaffected
KY3.5.1 kernel Unaffected
KY3.5.2 kernel Unaffected
KY3.5.3 kernel Unaffected
V6 kernel Unaffected