发布时间: 2024年6月21日
修改时间: 2024年11月30日
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: vduse: check that offset is within bounds in get_config() This condition checks "len" but it does not check "offset" and that could result in an out of bounds read if "offset > dev->config_size". The problem is that since both variables are unsigned the "dev->config_size - offset" subtraction would result in a very high unsigned value. I think these checks might not be necessary because "len" and "offset" are supposed to already have been validated using the vhost_vdpa_config_validate() function. But I do not know the code perfectly, and I like to be safe.
| NVD | openEuler | |
|---|---|---|
| Confidentiality | High | |
| Attack Vector | Local | |
| CVSS评分 | 7.1 | N/A |
| Attack Complexity | Low | |
| Privileges Required | Low | |
| Scope | Unchanged | |
| Integrity | None | |
| User Interaction | None | |
| Availability | High |
| 公告名 | 概要 | 发布时间 |
|---|---|---|
| KylinSec-SA-2024-2857 | In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: vduse: check that offset is within bounds in get_config() This condition checks "len" but it does not check "offset" and that could result in an out of bounds read if "offset > dev->config_size". The problem is that since both variables are unsigned the "dev->config_size - offset" subtraction would result in a very high unsigned value. I think these checks might not be necessary because "len" and "offset" are supposed to already have been validated using the vhost_vdpa_config_validate() function. But I do not know the code perfectly, and I like to be safe. | 2024年6月21日 |
| 产品 | 包 | 状态 |
|---|---|---|
| KY3.4-5A | kernel | Unaffected |
| KY3.5.2 | kernel | Unaffected |
| V6 | kernel | Unaffected |
