发布时间: 2022年4月29日
修改时间: 2024年10月31日
Node.js < 12.22.9, < 14.18.3, < 16.13.2, and < 17.3.1 did not handle multi-value Relative Distinguished Names correctly. Attackers could craft certificate subjects containing a single-value Relative Distinguished Name that would be interpreted as a multi-value Relative Distinguished Name, for example, in order to inject a Common Name that would allow bypassing the certificate subject verification.Affected versions of Node.js that do not accept multi-value Relative Distinguished Names and are thus not vulnerable to such attacks themselves. However, third-party code that uses node s ambiguous presentation of certificate subjects may be vulnerable.
| NVD | openEuler | |
|---|---|---|
| Confidentiality | None | None |
| Attack Vector | Network | Network |
| CVSS评分 | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| Attack Complexity | Low | Low |
| Privileges Required | None | None |
| Scope | Unchanged | Unchanged |
| Integrity | Low | Low |
| User Interaction | None | None |
| Availability | None | None |
| 公告名 | 概要 | 发布时间 |
|---|---|---|
| KylinSec-SA-2022-1373 | Node.js < 12.22.9, < 14.18.3, < 16.13.2, and < 17.3.1 did not handle multi-value Relative Distinguished Names correctly. Attackers could craft certificate subjects containing a single-value Relative Distinguished Name that would be interpreted as a multi-value Relative Distinguished Name, for example, in order to inject a Common Name that would allow bypassing the certificate subject verification.Affected versions of Node.js that do not accept multi-value Relative Distinguished Names and are thus not vulnerable to such attacks themselves. However, third-party code that uses node s ambiguous presentation of certificate subjects may be vulnerable. | 2022年5月11日 |
| KylinSec-SA-2022-1429 | nodejs security update | 2022年4月29日 |
| 产品 | 包 | 状态 |
|---|---|---|
| KY3.4-4A | nodejs | Fixed |
| KY3.4-5 | nodejs | Fixed |
